Divide et impera – ilGiornale.it

There is an understanding of the famous Latin phrase “divide et impera”, which could describe Vladimir Putin’s policy on Ukraine. Some scholars trace what remained proverbial to the decision of the Roman empire to divide the Macedonian kingdom, after its conquest, into four republics that had no relations with each other. Now, in the fog that envelops the negotiations with Kiev, the only clear element that can be grasped in the rhetoric, in the intentions communicated half-mouthed, in the military choices of Moscow, is that the Tsar would like to divide Ukraine in two if not more pieces. Our Gian Micalessin gave an account of this a few days ago in an analysis based on what filters through the exchanges of strategic opinions between Putin’s advisers: the rigidity with which in those parts the annexation of Crimea and the birth of independent republics are claimed Donbass, whose borders are unknown as the pro-Russian militias are expanding to the north, demonstrates that, in fact, the philosophy expressed by those minds is not far from reality.

Even the battlefield confirms it: it is very difficult for Russian divisions to withdraw from the territories conquered so far in the future, as at the same time it would be expensive and dangerous from a military point of view for Moscow to try to fully control a territory as vast as Ukraine. . The best option for Putin, in fact, would be to control a part of it, creating a satellite state loyal to Moscow, a sort of buffer state that would keep NATO and the European Union itself far from the borders of Russia. The traditional Kremlin policy, the one that distinguished the Romanov empire as the Soviet Union, would be implemented.

More. This solution has its roots in the twentieth century, in its obsessions, in its tragedies, in its logics that in our days appear distant and, in some ways, incomprehensible. But the phobias of the new Tsar show that he has remained deep down a man of the last century. In fact, what is the importance of having buffer states in a world where satellites are armed and missiles have intercontinental ranges? What guarantees do they offer? Probably none. In the Kremlin, however, people think as in the 60s because Putin was trained at that school. And that logic is the basis of the philosophy that heavily influenced the “Short Century”: it is the rationale that in many ways was at the basis of the division into two of Germany, Korea and Vietnam.

With a corollary of no small importance: dividing a nation is equivalent to questioning its sovereignty and in some ways to refute the very identity of its people. And, in fact, in Putin’s thinking, Ukraine does not have the identity of a people or a nation. It’s just a piece of Russia.

I wish I was so wrong, indeed I hope so, but the cruelty of this war and its senselessness for those who look at the world with today’s eyes, unfortunately shows that Ukraine is prey to ghosts of a past that we thought was buried.

Source link

About Alex Marcell

He likes dogs, pizza and popcorn. Already a fanboy of Nintendo and Sony, but today throws anything. He has collaborated on sites and magazines such as GameBlast, Nintendo World, Hero and Portal Pop, but today is dedicated exclusively to Spark Chronicles.

Check Also

“He had a palace in Venice and casino cards”

It is not a revelation. It is a confirmation. We already knew that Matteo Messina …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *