One will be established in parliament Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry on managing the pandemic COVID-19 in Italy: it was decided by the government led by Giorgia Meloniconfirming the commitments made with citizens during the election campaign, complete with official statement of the premier yesterday in the House during the keynote speech. A decision that also sees the full support of a part of the opposition, namely Action-Italia Viva, the parties of Renzi And Calendawhich during the pandemic had asked for the establishment of this instrument to shed light on the anomalies of the management by the Conte government.
Renzi himself, in full pandemic, orchestrated the political maneuver that led to the arrival of Draghi at Palazzo Chigi in the place of Conte in full controversy with the pandemic management of the grillino leader. In reality, an investigation has already taken place and has involved Domenico Arcuri, Extraordinary Commissioner for the Covid-19 emergency appointed by the then Prime Minister Conte. Last March, however, the accusations of corruption and embezzlement for Arcuri were dismissed and for the former commissioner a request for indictment is hypothesized only for abuse of office. The investigation, however, could expand and also affect other “big shots” of politics, protagonists (in negative) of the management of the pandemic.
In the sights of the parties that have asked for the commission of inquiry (Fratelli d’Italia and Lega on all, but also Forza Italia, Italia Viva and Action) there are delays in the management of the emergency, the underestimation of the problem by the government With youthe insistent rituals of “hugs a Chinese“And”aperitifs against fear”That the exponents of Democratic party And 5 Star Movement propagated while the virus was already spreading in the Po Valley imported directly from Wuhan. From Italy, then, the virus would have traveled around the world: probably without the underestimation of the Italian political authorities, the virus would not have arrived in Europe or at least not at that moment and not from Italy. The other countries had already blocked flights and connections with China, while in Italy the right-wing opposition was accused of being “racist”Against the Chinese because he asked for these blocks which did not arrive. And the government preached it was going “everything is fine“, Supported by the big media with the famous statements of Roberto Burioni to ‘Che tempo che fa’ on Rai 2 on February 2, 2020: “in Italy the risk is zero. The virus does not circulate, and this does not happen by chance: it happens because precautions are being taken. These constant alarms are not necessary and this discrimination against the Chinese is very hateful. It is a barbaric thing“. And instead there was no discrimination but only the legitimate concern that a virus was coming from China that would bring the country to its knees. But if the credibility of Burioni it then vanished like snow in the sun, no one has ever formally asked him to account for his repeated misleading statements that have misrepresented public opinion. And this could also be dealt with by the parliamentary commission of inquiry, which will cover all aspects of the management of the pandemic, including communication.
In this sense, he could certainly return to parliament “The infinite error”By the journalist Fabrizio Gattithe best investigative book on SARS-CoV-2 already censored by Fassino in parliament. Obviously the first focus of the commission of inquiry will be: Has the Conte government underestimated the problem and, guiltily, did not take adequate measures to prevent the virus from reaching our country? Subsequently the focus will be on restrictive measures: the delays for the declaration of the red zone in Codognoand then the opposite choice of the hard lockdown on the “Chinese model” but in our country practiced everywhere, without distinction of epidemiological conditions, even in the Regions of South in which in spring 2020 the virus was very isolated e in the hospitals there was no criticality complete with appeal by the then Minister Boccia with respect to the order of the Calabrian governor Santelli who, with the hospitals empty, in mid-April had decided to at least reopen the premises with outdoor tables.
Once again, following the history of the pandemic, the commission of inquiry will have to investigate what the Italian government did during the long summer 2020when for over 4 months the infections remained zero e Minister Speranza wrote a book on how he “defeated the virus”, which would then explode again in the autumn in an even more dramatic and disruptive way. It was the summer in which instead of investing in controlled mechanical ventilation, the minister of education Azzolina committed huge resources to the benches on wheels while the minister of infrastructure Toninelli launched the scooter bonus. All in an environmental context in which the authorities foraged a divisive narrative, accusing the citizens “rebels“, Whether they were Sunday runners on isolated beaches or lovers of summer nightlife, to be the”weepers“Of the virus. Remember the controversy over the party of the Napoli fans for the victory of the Italian Cup or on Briatore for the infections in its premises in Sardinia? The government discharged its responsibilities onto third parties in a fully successful attempt to divide public opinion by fomenting exaggerated fears of the extent of the virus and blaming absolutely innocent citizens who acted in full compliance with the rules.
At the center of the activities of the parliamentary commission of inquiry there will also be anomalies in the movements of the sanitary goods between Italy and other countries of the world: Why did Foreign Minister Di Maio send 18 tons of masks and other medical devices to China with a flight from Brindisi to Beijing which started on February 6, when Italy was already aware of the lack of these fundamental tools to fight the pandemic? On this Fratelli d’Italia has already achieved a great result removing the secret of the minutes of the Covid task force after a long dispute with the Ministry of Health which did not want to provide the contents of those documents.
From those documents it is clear how the Government already knew that in Italy there was a “limited availability”Of masks when he decided to send them to China, leaving our country without. And for months the authorities scrambled to say that “masks are not needed“, When in reality it was exactly the opposite. Did they do it in bad faith? And what were the links between the Italian and Chinese governments? The parliamentary commission of inquiry will also deal with this, and in the intentions of the Lega and the Brothers of Italy it will also go to the bottom on the anomalies of the management of the second part of the pandemicthe one under the Draghi government linked to vaccination campaign and the use of the Green Pass.
In this case the commission of inquiry will investigate what happened with the “Open day” of the Regionsto understand if the vaccine administrations have always been carried out in accordance with the rules, subject to health checks of all vaccinated people. The case of Camilla Canepathe 18-year-old who died after vaccination in Genoa, has already turned the spotlight on alleged irregularities in the vaccination campaign and the commission will inevitably have to clarify this too. As well as on the Green Pass, sold as the instrument that “it gives us the guarantee of finding ourselves among non-infected and therefore non-contagious people” from the Premier Draghi in person, and then revealed not only useless but even counterproductive, with very serious discrimination – these indeed real – against millions of Italian citizens arbitrarily excluded from society without any valid scientific reason. The Italians who have not been vaccinated to date are 6 million 812 thousand, including 2 million and 250 thousand children under 11 who were not subject to the Green Pass. The over 12s who resisted the blackmail by giving up social activities for months were therefore 4 million and 600 thousandbut many others are vaccinated unwillinglyliterally raped by the state only for the need to go to work or to continue to have a normal life.
The intentions of the Government there is in particular the need to shed full light on the evidence that has prompted the government to make the Green Pass mandatory even for the most basic activities of children, including minors, such as sport, against all scientific evidence. Just remember that the same Meloni and Salvini have decided not to vaccinate their children and have heavily opposed the methods of the vaccination campaign, in particular on the use of the Green Pass as a mandatory tool for fundamental activities in daily life.
Parliamentary inquiry commission: what it is and how it works
The parliamentary commission of inquiry is a parliamentary body that can be activated for investigation, knowledge and in-depth analysis on issues of public interest. Its establishment is provided for by article 82 of the Constitution and takes place through a dedicated law (if bicameral) or through a simple resolution of the chamber concerned (if single-chamber), usually in serious cases to carry out investigations that complement, and never replace, those of the judiciary.
The parliamentary committees of inquiry “have no task of judging, but only of gathering information and data necessary for the exercise of the functions of the Chambers”.
The most recent parliamentary committees of inquiry set up in parliament were those on the deaths of David Rossi and Giulio Regeni, and in the past also on the deaths of the Ilaria Alpi and Miran Hrovatin, on the case of depleted uranium and on many other tragedies in history. of Italy like the Moby Prince ferry disaster, the Cermis tragedy, accidents at work and the mafias. The parliamentary commission of inquiry hardly leads directly to significant judicial results, but it allows attention to be kept high on issues and arguments that would otherwise be forgotten and can stimulate the judiciary to take action against those responsible should new elements emerge in parliament. A parliamentary commission of inquiry on the management of the Covid-19 pandemic, however, would be an absolute novelty due to its historical proximity to the facts in question, their strong political connotation and the almost total lack of parallel judicial investigations in place. also because the alleged perpetrators, according to the parties that propose it, have held very important institutional positions until recently (some, such as Di Maio and Speranz, even until a few days ago). So the impression is that really, as he already said Matteo Renzi, on what happened in Italy in the management of the pandemic, now that the Government has changed “we will see some good ones”. What they told as the “Italy model”, then shattered in the face of the evidence of the data (with the toughest restrictions we are the country with the highest rate of infections and mortality), will now be literally passed to “x” rays to understand what was behind the choices that immediately appeared so extreme and beyond any logical rationality.